Archive for the ‘Christianity’ Category

I’d Rather be a Disciple

April 11, 2013

Scott Scruggs of Menlo Park Presbyterian Church also recently picked up on the line of thinking that Andy Stanley began about the difference between Christian and disciple.

Jesus seems always to have requested people to do something, not just be something. If he healed you, there was almost always some requirement. Maybe present yourself to a priest. Or sacrifice at the Temple. Or “go and sin no more.”

I am writing this in the Zurich airport. Down the terminal a little way from me is a group of Orthodox Jews. Several have narrow-brimmed hats squarely on the top of their head. A few have a wide-brimmed hat set back on the head where the front brim points almost straight up. They were saying their morning prayers. A few had prayer shawls over their heads. There were different styles of coats and suits.

Why the differences? They each follow a rabbi. They are disciples. They want so much to be like their rabbi, that they affect his dress style.

We don’t try to dress like our Rabbi (Teacher). We can’t even be 100% certain how he dressed. We can assume, but we don’t have a picture.

But that provokes the question about how we try to be like our Teacher/Master/Lord/Savior. If we don’t dress like him, I guess we have to act like him?

Perhaps our study and meditation for the next few weeks could be about how Jesus acted, what he did, what he said, how he said it, how he developed relationships, how he dealt with controversy, how he treated his friends.

The current term in vogue is to be a “Christ-follower.” I think that disciple is much stronger. I’m not just one of those who followed along while the going was good. I’m trying to be like the Master. I’m his disciple.

Happy Easter

March 31, 2013

Happy Easter.

As Paul said, “And if Christ has not been raised, our proclamation has been in vain and your faith has been in vain.”

There is a time for reflection. There is a time for celebration.

Celebrate today.

Endings and Beginnings

February 14, 2013

Some things come to an end. Some things begin.

I was at the United Club at Washington Dulles airport Monday when I glanced at the TV and saw the “breaking news” that Pope Benedict XVI was resigning. That is a revolutionary move for the Roman Catholic Church–and a bold move. But it is also honest. Some corporations require CEOs to retire at 65, thinking that above that a person is too old for the rigors of travel and decision-making required by the position. Benedict is 85. He has huge responsibilities. Hanging on when the body says it’s time to stop just for the sake of tradition seems heartless and selfish.

I am not Catholic, but over the years I have had many interfaces with the church. One year I taught in a Catholic school (English and history to 7th graders), attended Mass with the class twice a week, actually got to play guitar to accompany a Mass once. It was a great experience.

Benedict has a tremendous mind. He is a great theologian. If you want to read something to begin to understand Jesus, read “Jesus of Nazereth” (published when he was Joseph Ratzinger). That is a book that has greatly influenced me.

Henry Cloud’s recent book is “Necessary Endings.” I’ve taken that book to heart, too. Ended one professional relationship so that I could move on to another growth curve personally. Feels great.

Maybe there is something that you need to end–in order to create a new beginning. Maybe a destructive or unproductive habit. Maybe a career. Maybe a relationship.

A traditional Catholic told me this week, “But the Pope is ‘God on Earth.’ How can he just stop?” Since I’m not in the tradition, I have no answer. But I think the so-called conservative (how he was described in popular media when he was elected) proved to be pretty revolutionary. I have all the respect I can muster for him.

Still Figuring Out Jesus

December 17, 2012

Who Was That Man?

I’ve been staring at Matthew 2 for the past few days in contemplation. For the past 2,000 years, those of us who enjoy contemplating such things, especially take this time of year to reflect on just who this Jesus is.

Matthew is more concerned than the other New Testament writers about tying Jesus’ life to the history of God working through the Jewish people. In two chapters, he ties a lot together.

He had started with heavenly signs and visions. Then he looked at some ancient writings and saw parallels (I believe that this is the sort of teaching Jesus did with the two disciples on the road to Emmaus after the resurrection). He has Jesus born in Bethlehem. Then fleeing to Egypt only to be called out of Egypt (sound familiar?) and growing up in Nazareth (so he could be called a Nazarene). So Jesus, in his life, mirrors the experience of the nation.

Abraham is amazing

I am still amazed about Abraham. How is it that he decided to follow the “One God” rather than all the tribal gods of his homeland? We have the stories all about his life, but nothing really about the beginning. With Moses (the next great prophet or leader), we have the story of the burning bush where he first met God. Changed his life and the life of the people.

With Jesus, the “prophet greater than I” that Moses predicted, we are presented with one born into life with God. Certainly Mary sang her songs to Jesus as a baby filling him with the vision of the purpose of his birth. Certainly Joseph was a fantastic parental model of a person living the with-God life.

Then you look at the history of the Jewish people as the people who were supposed to be a blessing to all mankind as the keepers of the faith of the one true God (we call it monotheism). But they kept falling away. Then wanted a king. God told them through Samuel that that was a mistake. But they asked. They had three kings. Then the empire crumbled. Actually there was a fourth, but shortly after his ascension after Solomon, the kingdom split. Eventually the two kingdoms were wiped out.

Yet, hundreds of years later, the people still wanted another one of those kings.

But with Jesus, God tried again. It was not about a nation. It was about individuals. Each individual needs to repent and change their lives.

We still need that repentance. We still have so many people, even in this “Christian nation” who have not felt the need. And some do terrible things. There is so much work to do to bring everyone into the life with-God.

Emulating Jesus

October 7, 2012

So recently I’ve bee alluding to the fruit of the Spirit–love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. I think this fits individually as a model of the type of person we should try to become, just like what Paul was writing in his pastoral letters that I’ve been discussing about modeling the church.

Jon Swanson, in his blog 300 Words a Day, expanded on this a little, saying, “In 2 Corinthians 5, Paul explores the concept of Christ’s love controlling us. We will look differently than we did before His love controlled us. We may seem crazy to others (verse 13). Or not. It doesn’t matter. Part of Christ’s love controlling us is that we start to look at people differently (verse 16). Our perspectives become new. We’re like a growing plant that continuously produces new flowers. We look at people through the eyes of Jesus. He wept when he saw pain. He was angry when he saw injustice. He accepted others who society rejected – and then asked them to be willing to change.”

That’s what I was thinking a little when I thought about feeling what Jesus felt when he looked at his people and sighed. Sometimes I get angry at injustice. Sometimes I sigh when people just fall off the path and become lost.

I’m thinking about this model of a person. I think I’ll explore it for a while.

By the way, I’m in Anaheim, California at another conference. I’ll try to post at night before I go to bed. Usually I prefer at 5:30 am when I rise. But that would be late, now. There is a lot of energy in these conferences, and I’m working on a special project that will keep me quite busy. Not to mention a second conference by a competitor of the first Wednesday and Thursday right across the street. But I try to cover the work, say hi to lots of people I know, have fun, and still contemplate God.

Jesus Loves Me, This I Know

September 13, 2012

There are a couple of influential researchers and thinkers whom I respect. They capped their careers with interesting comments. These are Karl Barth, scholar and theologian, and Carl Jung, psychiatrist.

There was some point when I started noticing people rather than things, so I started studying psychology instead of engineering. I read a lot, but mostly I read (I think) everything that Carl Jung wrote. He was deep. Now I caution you, be careful reading “Jungians,” or followers of Jung. Many people took up part of his ideas and ran with them in some really weird directions.

But Jung was curious about the emotional/psychological afflictions of his patients and set out to explore the inner life. After a long career of research and writing, he was asked if he believed in God. The quote I saw from him was, “Believe? No, I don’t believe. I know.”

Karl Barth also was a scholar and writer. I have not read everything he wrote. Just some. But I also liked the comment he made toward the end of his career after writing thousands of pages of the results of his scholarship. Someone asked him to sum up his work, and he replied, “Jesus loves me, this I know.” (You know, the little song we teach children.)

Those two comments have had a lasting influence on me. A life with God begins with knowing God. And realizing His love. And then just living as He guides. And to me, that’s freedom.

We Think Too Much

September 12, 2012

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

Give up? My answer to a famous old argument among some theologians is–who cares? What did that argument–or most any other theological/philosophical argument–do to help me live a better life closer to God.

I guess I’m just curious. And interested. I’ve read many, many books by famous and not-so-famous philosophers and theologians. Taught the Bible for over 35 years. The conclusion of a life of research is that we often miss the point.

In the pastoral letters of Paul to Timothy and Titus, Paul warns several times about those who love to argue over words. He was right. Those arguments over words (perhaps coupled with the cultures that grew up around them) led to hundreds of years of bitter fighting with much loss of life in Christian Europe.

What’s the point? Look at Paul’s description of a model church. Outside of a few fundamental beliefs–Jesus was real, Jesus was resurrected, the Spirit lives, and God’s grace saves us–Paul mostly wrote about or described people who lived a life with God and for God.

There has been a strain of Christianity since around 340 AD that holds that to be a Christian means to adhere to a doctrine. You just publicly state that you agree with the doctrine and you’re a Christian. Some people still believe that today.

I don’t agree. I think to be a Christian means that we’re living a life with God where Jesus shows us the way. It’s not theology. It’s life where God is real.

This line of thinking is as old as Christianity itself. It has been written more and more often in the United States since the early to mid 60s. Here are some lyrics from a song written by Paul Stookey of the folk group Peter, Paul and Mary entitled Hymn that captures some of the idea:

I visited some houses where they said that You were living
And they talked a lot about You
And they spoke about Your giving.
They passed a basket with some envelopes;
I just had time to write a note
And all it said was “I believe in You.”

Passing conversations where they mentioned Your existence
And the fact that You had been replaced by Your assistants.
The discussion was theology,
And when they smiled and turned to me
All that I could say was “I believe in You.”

Be Ye Doers of the Word Not Hearers Only

July 11, 2012

Elaine Pagels writes in her book, “Revelations,” that original readers of the Revelation of John of Patmos saw the evil one, the whore of Babylon, as Rome. There were periodic eras over the first three centuries of the Christian church where the Romans specifically persecuted Christians. Each time followers pulled out that book to gain solace about the eventual victory of Christ over Rome.

Then in the early 4th Century (early 300s), Constantine took the image of Christ the conqueror from the book and made it his standard behind which to battle his rivals for the throne of Rome. Pagels does not mention the influence of his mother, who had converted to Christianity some years earlier.

When Constantine won, he made Christianity the official religion of the Empire and gave special status to local leaders called bishops. Then the battle for possession of that office began in earnest. As did the battle for an official interpretation of what it meant to be a Christian. She maintains that leaders of that era, especially Athanasius, re-interpreted the good vs. evil depiction in Revelation as the battle between different adherents within the movement. Official vs. heretic, if you will.

But the idea I’ve been pondering for several days, now, concerns what it means to be Christian. Constantine recognized that if he was to establish a “universal” Church for the empire, that is, “catholic” Church, there needed to be a definition. He convened a council at Nicaea which developed the Nicene Creed still used by churches.

She then paints the development of the church as the victory of those who believed that Christians were ones who accepted the Creed (essentially followers of the Gospel of John and the Revelation of John) over those who believed that Christians should be doers of the Word (essentially those who favored the other Gospels and Paul).

Pagels might be a little simplistic in the analysis, but still today we have many Christians who believe that adherence to dogma takes precedence over experiencing Jesus and doing the Word.

Me, whenever I’m presented with an either/or situation, I ask why not both..or neither. In this case, I’m a proponent of both. The Nicene Creed and Apostle’s Creed help to keep faith grounded. It prevents going down dead-end rabbit holes of false faith–perhaps like trying to blend New Age philosophies into Christianity. But the subsequent 1800 years of history has shown that blind adherence to a dogma leads to war, strife, inhumanity.

I like the quote I used as a title–“Be Ye doers of the Word, not hearers only.” Our challenge is to walk with Jesus as we live a life pleasing to God.

Christian Business People

April 23, 2012

There are two types of Christian business people–those who flaunt it and those who quietly live the life. I’ve met both in my life. And I hate to say this, but the former ones scare me. If I meet one, I instinctively reach for my pocket to see if my wallet is still there. That sounds cynical, but I’ve met only a handful and every one with whom I’ve had a business dealing owes me money promised.

I’ve met many of the second type. They have been universally ethical, honest and upright in their dealings. And great people with whom to share dinner.

I try to know the line between analysis and cynicism. Experience can be a bitter teacher. I typically trust people until I’ve been given reason not to. It’s only hurt me a handful of times–and I recover quickly anyway.

What brings this up is listening to a guy at church Sunday who is trying to be both types while only exhibiting the traits of the latter. If anyone can break the mold, he can. That would be fantastic. We have too many of those negative images. We need a positive one. What I picked up out of his talk was the way he talked about dealing with people. It’s like he cares about them. And that’s the best marketing you can have.

I hope he succeeds.

Lost Opportunity for Reconciliation

January 30, 2012

Reading the beginning of Romans where Paul is trying hard to convince people to leave old categories separating people behind and enter a new, universal fellowship with God.

Then I thought about the apostles at the same time who went into Syria–not only to Jews who lived there, but also to Syrians. Christianity had spread to Greeks and Romans already before Paul. It had spread among Syrians and Egyptians (we know from reading the Desert Fathers among other writings).

Just think if people had adopted that model. Think of the strife, fighting and bitterness in so much of the world today that could have been avoided.

But then I think of the hundreds of years of European history where Christians fought against each other in often bloody wars. Catholics against Protestant. So, I guess the mere adoption of a Christian facade overlaid on tribal identity wasn’t quite the answer.

We need, individually, to return to Paul’s writing and absorb it. As he said to his own time, “there is neither Jew nor Greek.” We need to feel that in our hearts. We will not categorize people in order to judge them. We will accept people and love them.