Archive for the ‘Study’ Category

Seeking Wisdom

September 27, 2012

In Proverbs 4, the teacher says the beginning of wisdom is: get wisdom, and whatever else you get, get insight. The rest of the chapter discusses pursuing wisdom or the path of the wicked.

What do you fill your mind with? What do you read? What do you watch on TV or movies? Music?

Where you turn your attention and focus, there your mind goes. It occurred to me after writing a piece a few days ago about thinkers that most of the time when I’m reading theology or spiritual writers, they tend to be seekers. They are seeking God. And they write about their search. And their discoveries. I read some “theology” where people think they have discovered a previously unknown fact in the Bible and build a new theology. I see where they are going, wonder what translation they’ve discovered from the Greek or Hebrew that 2,000 years of scholars have missed, and go on.

I also listen to good teachers whom I’ve vetted as trustworthy. I prefer my theology to be traceable to ancient sources. Not some new age or literalist thinker.

It’s political season. Are you filling your mind with CNN or Fox? Do you realize that they exist solely to get you emotionally involved so that you’ll keep watching? And they can keep feeding you ads?

Other people have one spiritual teacher they follow. It is good to seek many in order to balance your learning and assure that you are not going off chasing squirrels.

Ancient wisdom held that as you think you shall become. Earl Nightengale put it “you become what you think about.” You can fill your mind with angry emotion and become a surly, angry person. Or fill your mind with wisdom, and become a reflection of the fruits of the Spirit–love, joy, peace, and the others.

Your choice.

Bible Study and Christian Service

August 29, 2012

Bible study as a culture neutral experience? Or, better said, cross-cultural experience. Bible Study magazine has an article this month on the organization InterVarsity Christian Fellowship. This is an organization for college students with local associations run by students.

It raised an interesting point. For many students, going away to the university (for my international readers, we use college and university interchangeably over here) is perhaps the first experience in multi-culturism. Perhaps it’s even the first time associating with people of different Christian persuasions.

The idea that the Bible is actually neutral in that regard–where you can gather groups of people from different cultures and different denominations in an honest and deep study of Scripture–never dawned on me. Not that I don’t approach it that way. But as a philosophy, that’s cool.

Perhaps since I was raised Methodist (4th generation, I’m told) with two Baptist minister uncles and then taught in a Catholic school, I regard all these and the rest as just different manifestations of how to worship God. Often it’s a matter of culture and upbringing. Fortunately in the U.S., outside of bouts of discrimination toward new denominations, we have not fought any religious wars along sectarian lines. In Europe, there’s an entirely different experience, which I’m sure deeply influences things there.

Just start with small groups and a Bible. And a passion for learning.

Service opportunities

Thought I’d pass along some reading I’ve done. There is a Website called “Lifehacker.” The hacker part comes from the technology sector where people “hack” electronics and programs to make them better. So Life-hacker is site that offers tips on how to live.

One of the Spiritual Disciplines is service. Many people are either confused or apprehensive about service opportunities. This Life hacker article discusses How to Find a Volunteer Gig You’ll Enjoy. Maybe it’ll help push some of you over the hurdle into a life of finding satisfaction in volunteer service.

Argumentative Just To Be Argumentative

August 28, 2012

Looking at Paul’s instructions to Timothy about his vision for a local church, Paul talks about idle chatter as I discussed yesterday. He could also be referring to his comments a little earlier about those who teach something different from Paul’s teachings having a “morbid craving for controversy and for disputes about words.” He also calls those people conceited and “understanding nothing.”

Learning comes from study plus discussion. Maybe the discussion is held through reading many books. The discussion could also be among people–say in a small study group. Someone says, I just read this but I don’t understand exactly what the author means by this. Another says, I think it means that. Still another refers to an ancient source that offers an interpretation.

We don’t enter the world as humans knowing everything that everyone has figured out before us. We must learn it for ourselves. That is hard work that many do not wish to undertake. Many just say, tell us what to believe and we’ll be happy.

Dostoevsky tells a story about Jesus meeting the Grand Inquisitor in medieval Spain in his novel “The Brothers Karamazov.” (Read the book, don’t watch the movie.) In the story, the Grand Inquisitor tells Jesus that the people just want to be fed. They don’t want freedom. So please just go back to where you came from and let the Church tell people what to believe.

Other people are rebellious. They don’t want to follow the leader. They just like to argue. I have known these people in both church and business. Even in soccer. They just seem to like to argue. They absorb a lot of your energy just dealing with them.

I’m with Paul on this one. If you have someone who is just plain argumentative–maybe because they just need the spotlight focused on them–you’re better off without them around.

I don’t think Paul would dislike the honest discussion of seekers. It’s those “conceited” people who just like to argue who are the problem.

Be Aware of Your Spiritual Influencers

July 9, 2012

It’s summer and vacation time. With grandkids at 3 and 5, there isn’t as much time for reading as usual. I did finish a couple of books last week. They couldn’t be more different. Ravi Zacharias, “Why Jesus?”, holds New Age spirituality up to the benchmark of Christian dogma and finds it misleading and wanting. Elaine Pagels tackles the politics and society of the early centuries of Christian thought focusing on interpretations of the “Revelation of John (of Patmos)” in “Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation.”

Has anyone ever made a chance remark that influenced what direction your life takes from that place in time? The speaker at Willow Creek Community Church Sunday talked about a “chance” encounter with a man whom he had never met before nor seen later who set him off toward a career in the ministry. Made me think of chance remarks that people have made to me that either set me off toward something or stopped me from going that direction.

I was coaching youth soccer and was on the school board. A chance remark from the athletic director asking if I’d ever thought about becoming a referee started me on what is now a 26-year career as a soccer referee leading up to receiving a high award Saturday.

What really concerns me reading through these books is the care that must be take when someone makes remarks about theology or belief that can send you off on a wrong path. Zacharias takes on some current cultural heroes in Deepak Chopra and Oprah Winfrey. He shows how their incomplete philosophy of salvation can lead people astray. One remark from Winfrey while at the height of her power on TV could move millions of people.

I wrote recently about reading source material. Go back to the Bible for grounding. Read lots of other books and authors, but always ground it in source material to test whether they have gone off in a wrong direction.

Read Source Writings

July 5, 2012

It’s Independence Day celebration time again in the US. Like most of our Founding Fathers, I’m uncomfortable mixing politics and religion. That combination does not have a stellar history in the world.

I know that many readers of this blog are not US citizens, but it is worthwhile to get a copy of the Declaration of Independence and what we call the “Bill of Rights”–or the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution. It’s interesting in the history of writing constitutions that the writers had to agree to amendments before adoption. There are many good ideas contained in those writings.

Professors at the university seemed to believe in reading “about” thinkers instead of reading the thinkers themselves. This holds true for math and science as well as philosophy and theology. Drove me crazy. To this day, I believe in reading the source documents first. Think about them. Then dive into secondary sources to further your understanding.

But first–read and think for yourself.

It works the same with the Bible. First, read it. Then ponder and pray. Then study deeper with other sources.

We hear too much about what politicians and journalists tell us about the Bill of Rights and Declaration. Then we color that with our prejudices. Best is to return to the text. Read it again with fresh eyes. Be prepared for the shock of understanding.

Diagram As Study Aid

June 4, 2012

Last week I wrote about the need to visualize ideas to help either express yourself or understand. Turns out I had that book (Blah, Blah, Blah by Dan Roam) in my stack of t0-read books. Interesting book.

As I studied Romans a few months ago, I started to sketch out the ideas. This is an unfinished flow chart that I started and captured digitally. (I’m actually playing with a new iPad app called Whiteboard Pro.) You could chart the main ideas. See how they fit together. And then get a sense of the argument. I like to see how the parts fit into the whole. It helps explain the context and avoid the problems that happen when you take things out of context.

This is just a quick sketch from memory, but hopefully you can get the idea. Under each of the main items in the flow chart, you could list Paul’s main examples or points. You could add points that you found important. Then you could get a sense of what the author really means. Try one.

Outline of Romans

Here is a quick sketch I made of a flow chart of Paul’s argument in Romans.

Boost Your Learning Skills

May 30, 2012

This is a guest post from Hanna Lindstrom who contributes to the Website Educational Psychology. She saw that I sometimes write on education and offered a post that is timely not only for students in the university but for all of us who remain as students. She actually wrote it for my other blog on manufacturing, but it seemed to fit after yesterday’s post about continuous learning. It’s the first guest post I’ve used in years. So welcome Hanna.

Note-taking’s Role in the Learning Process

Getting a doctorate in Educational Psychology means focusing on the social, ethical, and cognitive development of students, from early childhood to adulthood. It is the study of learning, and it deals with when, where, why, and how kids learn most effectively. “In the classroom, understanding and harnessing the nuanced interplay of disparate concepts like motivation and intelligence can contribute to a student’s long term scholastic (and life) success.” Educational psychologists look at individual differences in learning, studying both gifted and learning-disabled children. They are interested in ideas like the multiple intelligence theory, appropriate learning goals, and the motivation of students to learn. They use this research to build better curricula to improve the quality of education.

Note-taking is of interest to educational psychologists because it helps students learn and write. But even though methods for understanding and for writing are widely taught and practiced by students throughout their schooling, note-taking is a skill that is rarely taught, even at the most basic level. This is true despite the fact that note-taking is expected of students in all of their course-work. In postsecondary school education, where material is not often repeated, note-taking becomes even more integral to success. The practice is particularly important and useful for storing, digesting, and analyzing lecture content.

There is a minimalist view of the skill, which ignores the knowledge and skills that are necessary to produce valuable notes. From this perspective, the practice is seen as little more than transcription, necessitating a working knowledge of condensing techniques, like shortened words and symbols. This view sees notes as a written form of the material it aims to reproduce, which means that the material only becomes useful when referred back to at a future date.

Note-taking can be much more beneficial to student learning. When performed by a skilled student, taking notes not only aims to record information, it is designed to aid reflection and understanding. Building a stable, long-term memory of a topic often involves direct engagement with the material. In higher education institutions, the information transmitted by lectures and readings is only the beginning. It then becomes the student’s task to dissect that information after class. Note-taking can become an effective information-processing tool, which contributes to making judgments, resolving issues, and making decisions about the content. Taking notes can aid thought processes, such as the resolution of mathematical problems.

Though students take notes to record information they will need later, for an exam or to write a paper, the process of taking the notes is not passive. The act of taking notes is part of the memorization process, and it creates a form of “internal” storage. In addition, taking notes relieves working memory, freeing up the mind for comparison, application, and analysis.

There are at least three primary skills that a note-taking course would teach: comprehension through note-taking, producing notes, and how to manage and make decisions regarding the activity, as a whole. The first item can be rephrased as the art of summarization. Teaching students to produce notes by shortening words and changing syntax helps, but it is rarely done. A suggestion for the third item is a “metacognitive questionnaire on note-taking,” which invites students to examine their note-taking activity.

But perhaps the most important and fundamental benefit of note-taking is that it allows students to express themselves, which leads to greater satisfaction with their education. More work needs to be done, both inside and outside the classroom, to emphasize this important practice.

Never Stop Learning

May 29, 2012

Does your entire knowledge of the Bible come from what you were taught as a child? Were you inoculated with education? I once read a theory called “the inoculation theory of education.” You were injected with a little bit of the “disease” so that you wouldn’t get any major dose later.

There is a meme going around the Web in one of the areas I read that goes something like “20 things I know that I wished I knew when I was 20.” There was another one over the weekend. One of the points the writer made was to never stop reading. In fact, increase the amount of reading you do.

While I respect people I know with many advanced degrees, I’m content with the fact that I dropped out of grad school before finishing my degree. It really wouldn’t have meant much in my life. You see, I’m almost completely self-taught. I read, listen, think. Then read some more. I only had one math teacher who was really a teacher. For the rest, I learned some math from school, but I learned a lot more outside school. Same with engineering, philosophy, theology, psychology.

You can do that too, if you wish. I read another guy on the Web who talked about a friend. His friend said he wished he could read as many books as him. “How much TV do you watch?” The friend replied a couple of hours most evenings. So, cut out the TV and read. It’s simply a choice. Do you want to learn and grow or simply be entertained?

Read the Bible. Read respected spiritual writers. Check out the “Desert Fathers.” For example John Climacus had psychology figured out 13 centuries before Freud–and probably did a better job. He understood all the emotions and energies that prevent you from living with God. He wrote it in The Ladder of Divine Ascent. A tip–try reading some things you might disagree with. You broaden your experience. It’ll force you to think. You may learn something new.

Introverts and Extroverts

April 12, 2012

There are two types of people. Well, maybe three. There are people who get energy from being with other people. We call those extroverts. There are people who get energy from being alone. These are called introverts. Then there are people like me, I suppose. On the Myers-Briggs Types Indicator, my scores on that scale come back ambivalent.

But how we are determines how we like to worship. It determines how we work best. But we need a little of both.

A man called Chris Anderson started a conference years ago where he invited people with significant ideas to present short talks (no longer than 20 minutes but most often about 10 minutes) to an audience who paid as much as five figures to the left of the decimal point to listen. He called it the TED Talks conference. It became successful. There are now many of these around the world. He now records them and you can watch for free.

Recently Susan Cain presented on being an introvert in a culture that increasingly rewards (or forces you to be) an extrovert. It is worth a listen.

In our spiritual practice, we need to be aware of our tendency and seek balance. Introverts would tend toward study and meditation. Extroverts tend toward worship, celebration and service. Following the example of Jesus, everyone needs time alone to find God and center themselves. It might be difficult for extroverts, but it is necessary to achieve depth in your celebrations and service. Study and meditation alone will not make you whole. Introverts need to get out and be with people. Learn to celebrate and serve. Just as Jesus often withdrew to be with God in order to serve more, we also need to seek that balance.

Why Is It So

March 28, 2012

Why? Did you ever notice that when you are studying something and a question is raised, you or someone will answer fairly quickly–probably with the “correct” answer? But a skilled group leader will continue probing until the answers become much more meaningful?

In manufacturing, we have a way of thinking called “Lean.” One of the techniques we use is called “5 Whys.” If you start asking that question, after 2 or 3 you’ll begin getting at the root cause–the real reason.

In a group, the thing to watch out for is that often the brightest person gives that quick, correct response. That’s what they were taught in school. Remember and regurgitate. I had immense difficulty in school–especially with chemistry and math–until I discovered the remember and regurgitate formula. When I discovered math was simply manipulating symbols according to rules, it became easy. But I always asked, “Why?” Or, “How do you know that?” And that got me into trouble.

Asking five whys is a great way to study the Bible and other spiritual writing. If I ask, “What’s the most important thing about Jesus?”, you could say, “He came back to life after dying.” You would be correct. Collect your “A” and go home.

But, you could take that correct answer and ask “Why?” Then ask it again. Pretty soon you will reach the deep meaning that the Resurrection has in your life.

“Why” can be the best friend you have in study. It will lead you toward understanding. It’s not so important how much you know, as it is how deep you go.