Archive for the ‘Leadership’ Category

Trust Comes From Truthfulness, Goodwill

March 12, 2012

I wrote Friday about trust. To go deeper into the word, Gary Hamel, writing in his latest book “What Matters Now,” says, “Trust is not simply a matter of truthfulness, it is also a matter of amity and goodwill. We trust those who have our best interests at heart, and mistrust those who seem deaf to our concerns.”

That has been a problem with leadership in the Christian church for centuries. Especially so maybe today. In the United States it has become possible for preachers using the reach of TV to build empires accumulating much wealth. But it’s hard to emphasize that and have followers think you have their best interests at heart. The empire eventually crashes.

We are supposedly living with the “Me Generation” in charge. There are many people who think “me first.” This attitude is often reflected in our political leadership. When I was studying sales (to become one of them), I was taught to tune into my customer’s radio station WII-FM — what’s in it for me. Too often that is what the salesman is thinking–but about himself, not the customer.

At this time of year especially, think about Jesus–not to mention Peter, Paul, John, Stephen and the others. They certainly didn’t exhibit the WII-FM attitude. Thank God.

It is a challenge to us to try to live counter to the prevailing culture of self-centeredness. When we lead, do we exhibit truthfulness, amity and good will? That’s a good thing to stop and think about.

Can You Convince People to Change

January 12, 2012

Paul, the apostle, would visit a new town and immediately visit a local Jewish gathering. He would begin to explain their Scriptures in a new way. He would say that every interpretation you have been taught that has been handed down from teacher to student for hundreds of years (much longer than Europeans have been on North America) is wrong. And he would then try to teach them a new way to look at them.

It would be as if someone came to America and told Americans, “You know all those things you have been taught about the founding and purpose of America is wrong. Actually, ….” They’d be thrown out of the gathering.

No wonder Paul had such a difficult time of it. Some of his teaching undermined the credibility of Jewish leadership in the Temple. No wonder they wanted to kill him (after they killed Jesus, Stephen and others). Try to convince your boss she’s wrong! Take that thought up a few notches in intensity when you’re trying to completely change the structure of a religion. (Think, “Out, out, you Bishops.”)

Paul would win over some of the Jews to the new Way. But not that many, evidently. And he stirred up so much hatred in the establishment, that he wound up in prison–OK, sort of a gentleman’s prison, but still not free to go.

This shows the limits of using intellectual persuasion to convince someone to change. The growth of the church is really explained in the first few chapters of Acts–especially Acts 2. It was through the lives of those who had been changed. Kind of like that famous scene in the movie “When Harry Met Sally” where the two older women looked at Meg Ryan and told the waitress, “I want what she’s having.”

Take a lesson from Acts, then. It is through how you live that people will be open to coming to Jesus. Then you can explain why. And teach the background. And help them develop intellectually as well as spiritually. Just as your children learn more by watching you than listening, so your example by how you live teaches more than your words.

Two types of people

November 15, 2011

Luke records in the book of Acts that Paul, Silas and Timothy (and evidently Luke himself) decided to go from Asia Minor to Macedonia. When they were in Thessaloniki, “the Jews” stirred up a lot of problems for them, so they went on to Berea. Well, the Jews from Thessaloniki heard about it and went to Berea to stir up more trouble.

The people there decided to ship Paul off to Athens while Silas and Timothy stayed behind.

I got to thinking–there must be two types of people. And that may be what helped Paul have so much success. Paul evidently was the argumentative one. I bet some would even say obnoxious (especially if you didn’t agree with him). This made him a divisive figure. So when trouble visited Berea, they must have said, “Let’s ship Paul out of here.”

But Silas and Timothy stayed behind for some time. They must have been the teacher/pastor/counselor types of people. When they left, there was a strong church in place.

Bet we still need two kinds of people. Oh, there is also a third type–the ones who do nothing. Which are you?

Prayer and Fasting

October 31, 2011

I’ve been studying in The Acts of the Apostles for a couple of months. If there is a sort of foundation theme to the book, it lies in the spiritual disciplines of worship, prayer and fasting. In the first few chapters things happen when the group is gathered together in worship, prayer and fasting. Then decisions are made later as they are beginning to get organized only after prayer and fasting.

This seems to be a worthy practice for us to emulate–both in church work and in our personal lives. We tend to get so opinionated. We are capable of having a firm opinion on things even in the face of unarguable facts and evidence to the contrary. And we are capable of arguing that point forever. No listening. No compromise.

How refreshing would it be to have a process something like this–recognize a problem that requires a decision; formulate the problem clearly; stop, take a deep breath, pray, center your whole attention on God (something fasting will do for you); and then listen for God to speak.

The original apostles made momentous decisions that way. While fasting and praying, they were consumed by the Holy Spirit. Good things happened to those who gathered together for prayer, fasting and worship. I bet it still happens today. Maybe we should all try that.

Jesus a New Kind of King

April 29, 2011

I’m still pondering Jesus’ last week before his execution. That week was crucially important to his followers. A huge chunk of the Gospels detail that one week. Events leading to his birth take a little space, his 2-1/2 year ministry about half, the last week something like 40 percent, and the 40 days he was with them after his resurrection is barely detailed (none at all in Mark).

John, probably the Gospel that can be traced to Jesus’ inner circle, does not talk about the Passover Meal in detail. He is the only one to talk about the foot washing. Obviously that was significant.

There they were. Still thinking that Jesus was going to be King of Israel, kicking the Romans out. Only a few days before, they had entered Jerusalem as potential conquerors. They were celebrated the high holy days of Passover. Emotions had to be high and optimistic. When and how was Jesus going to reveal his true destiny as King?

Then, at dinner, Jesus removed his outer garment, and like a slave or servant, prepared to wash the disciples’ feet. Now, wait just a second there, partner. This is not the work of a King. This is not the work of the disciples or any Hebrew man. Servants do this dirty work.

They still don’t know what’s up. Peter says that no way he’s going to let a King wash his feet. Kings don’t do that. But Jesus says, “If I don’t wash your feet, then you won’t have any place in my kingdom.” So Peter says, in effect, then wash all of me.

It had to be difficult. When you have one thing in your head, it’s hard to grasp the opposite. Happens to us. All the time. They had one vision of King in their heads. They just couldn’t grasp a different view.

Jesus was showing a new kind of king. A new kind of leader. It wasn’t about power. It was about serving.

As Bill Hybels, sr. pastor of Willow Creek Community Church asked in his Easter message–imagine if all the politicians in America would put aside their petty squabbling and power struggles and truly serve American people; imagine if business leaders put aside their power and truly served their people; imagine if husbands and wives put aside their agendas and truly served each other.

It has been 20 years shy of 2,000 years since Jesus showed a new kind of leadership by voluntarily allowing himself to be executed. Yet, humans still have a problem understanding servant leadership.

Try imagining a new world.

Should the Church be led by Scholars?

April 8, 2011

One reason I like to read Donald Miller (Blue Like Jazz and other books) is that he takes the time to think and has the courage to write ideas that I’ve played with for years. Or at least ask the questions.

In a blog post this week, he asks if the church should be led by teachers and scholars. As he puts it, the early leaders were fishermen, tax collectors, at least one political activist (Simon the Zealot–that being a radical political party).

I do not subscribe to the popular theory perpetuated by scholars that these were uneducated, illiterate peasants. But I think they were students, not scholars The teachers and scholars of the day were the Pharisees and scribes (as identified in the New Testament).

Think about today. You pretty much have to have a Master’s degree to be a church leader. That is a symbol of scholarly achievement. But Miller points out that much of the division of the church is a result of scholarly disagreement or “academic divisions.” He says, “The reason I don’t understand my Lutheran neighbor is because a couple of academics got into a fight hundreds of years ago. And the rest of the church followed them because, well, they were our leaders. So now we are divided under divisions caused by arguments a laboring leadership might never have noticed or cared about.”

Miller says that we think Christian growth comes from studying more. But Jesus pushed his disciples out and said something like, “you know enough, you have a guide, go out and teach the world to obey my commands.” It’s actually the doing that leads to the growing.

I teach. But I’d rather be a guide than a scholar. I gave up that life path many years ago.

You can’t witness to theory. You can witness to what you’ve experienced and then reflected upon. This Lent, perhaps you should become less reliant on Scholars and Teachers for your growth and go out and do what Jesus wanted. After all, that’s one reason he died.

Translating Passion into Action

November 16, 2010

I ran into another aspect of “faith and works” last night at a meeting. It’s having a passion for something and sustaining that passion through the hard work of acting on it. Passion starts out as an emotion. Maybe God speaks to you and you get really fired up about His suggestion. Maybe it’s starting a mission to another country. Maybe it’s feeding people thrown out of work by the recession. But it’s a God call.

God doesn’t expect you to only be fired up about it. As my new best friend James says, faith without works is dead. Or as Bill Cosby once described about his college football team (probably just a funny story) where the coach gave a rousing speech to get them all fired up to go out and win the game in the second half and then the door was locked from the locker room. The passion expired.

So there are stages to the process. You start out on fire with an idea. But then you have to do two things that can be tough. And you’ll lose some of that exuberance. These are planning the details of the work and convincing others that this is an important call from God. At first you’ll notice some fraying of the passion. You begin to doubt just a little in the face of opposition.

That’s when you take the advice of Thomas a Kempis I noted yesterday–just do something. Take the next action. Talk to the next person. That will get you back on track. And you’ll accomplish the work God has placed before you.

New Leadership Rises

August 24, 2010

I’m still contemplating the end of the gospel of Mark. So the group has an intimate, friendly if not joyous, but yet strange Passover meal. The leader is acting a little strangely, what with washing their feet and all. They whisper about betrayal, but still don’t really know what to expect. Little do they know that by tomorrow night they will be leaderless–sort of. Or at least temporarily. Little did they know that they had to go from student to leader almost overnight. It’s sort of like going from adolescence to maturity in the space of a month.

Think about high school athletics. OK, maybe a stretch, but consider this. One year there is senior leadership of the team, but they inevitably graduate (or get too old). But the next year, last year’s juniors are this year’s seniors, and new leadership arises.

While the disciples had Jesus, they didn’t have to think. Jesus made the decisions. Jesus did the teaching. Jesus chose the inner circle. Jesus arranged the Passover dinner. And the next night he was gone.

So we sit in our comfortable homes and churches and criticize the disciples. What would you have done. You don’t become a leader overnight. Think of times in your life when there was a leader and then she or he was gone. Died. Moved away. Whatever. Wasn’t there a period of time for adjustment?

So they gradually regrouped. Then they experienced the new Jesus. Then they started to exercise their own leadership muscles. And in only 40 days came the day of Pentecost when they announced to the world, “We’re back.” And they each went out and started faith communities. And Paul, Barnabas and others were called, and they traveled the world establishing faith communities. And so, here we are.

The thing that grieves me personally is this thought–what have I done to start new faith communities and raise up new leaders? Have I done enough? Have you? That is one of our tasks–to bring up new leaders to proclaim that the Kingdom of Heaven is here.

Balance Needs Focus

August 13, 2010

Yoga is a discipline of bringing body, mind and spirit together. Psychologists, even those who observed humans 5,000 years ago, know that one sign of illness is when your emotions, mind, body are out of balance and working at cross purposes. One classic Yoga pose that is often the picture used when someone discusses it is called tree pose. This is a balance pose where you stand on one leg, the foot “rooted” to the ground. The other foot is placed on the inner thigh of the “trunk.” The hands are above the head with palms together.

I try to hold this pose for at least 10 breaths. What you discover is that the trick is not balance, per se, but focus. You must clear your mind, focus your eyes on a stable object then concentrate on your breathing.

I’ve been writing a lot about focus lately, because I’ve discovered it is key to a spiritual life. My study of Mark has reached the last 3 chapters where Mark tells the story of Jesus’ last couple of days on earth as a human. I’ve been contrasting Jesus (our model) with Peter (someone with whom we can identify).

Except for the interesting story about his cursing the fig tree, Jesus faced his coming trials and knowledge that his friends would desert him with tremendous focus and balance. His stable object of focus was God. He never wavered from his life with his father. And he kept his balance. Whether being grilled by the ruling council of his religion or by civil authorities with the power to kill him, he was a model of balance. He did not lash out at his accusers–even though the accusations were not true and even contradictory.

Peter, on the other hand, lost it. His emotions swung from blustery “I’ll never desert you” to “I never knew that man.” He lost his focus out of fear. But do not condemn him. Can you say that you have Jesus’ perfect courage? Look inside yourself. What would you have really done in his place? Stand up in the face of the crowd and be killed, too?

Then Peter came to self-realization. He saw into his own mind, body and spirit. He wept. This was a moment of realization. You cannot truly live with God until you realize deeply that you don’t have that focus on God. We also know the rest of the story. Jesus said he would go ahead of them to Galilee after he was raised from the dead. He did. And he met Peter. And he blessed Peter three times to counter the three denials. And Peter realized his focus, his strength, and his balance. And he became a great leader.

Politics and religion meet the spirit

July 20, 2010

By what authority do you teach? When you stop to think about it, that’s an interesting question. In today’s world, if you’re “ordained” by a religious body (say, Catholic, United Methodist, Lutheran, and so on), then you teach by the authority of that organization. Me? I just started teaching. Never thought about authority.

That question directed by the Jewish leaders (who were both religious and, in many ways, civil, leaders) to Jesus was what we call a loaded question. Jesus was openly questioning their authority. They thought they were just part of the leadership lineage that traced back to Moses. Somebody had to be in charge. Somebody had to oversee religious rites, tell people what was right, interpret God to the people. There had always been priests beginning when Moses appointed some. They were appointed to be part of that line of authority. They were essentially political leaders.

Mark says that this confrontation came the day after Jesus drove the commercial people out of the Temple. This was a revolutionary act directly affecting the income of the leaders–as well as their authority. So they asked Jesus by what authority he did that. But Jesus asked them about where John the Baptist derived his authority. Many people thought it came directly from God. But the leaders had opposed him.

Ah, here is where politics and religion meet the Spirit. If you are a leader and you want to maintain your authority, you begin to think like Mark reports. “If we say from man, the people will get mad at us. But if we say from God, then they’ll ask why we didn’t support him.” So, they didn’t answer. And that’s the problem with organizational leadership where people in power want to maintain power as their objective. This can happen at any level of any organization where someone gets comfortable and likes being in charge.

Jesus did not organize in that manner. His organization technique–one that is being emulated by many even in businesses today–is one of teaching, empowering, setting free. He gathered willing people to join him. Taught them. Gave them the power to act along with the foundation that would prepare them to act in a right manner. And eventually he set them free to lead themselves.

No matter where you are a leader–family, church committee, civic organization, political, denominational–think on these things. Are you in it for you? Or are you in it because God wants you to lead, teach, empower and set free?

Oh, Jesus authority? It came from God. By whose authority do you teach?